Two prevailing models that influence corrections today are the risk/need/responsivity model and the good lives model. The risk/need/responsivity model is comprised of three basic principles: (1) the â€œriskâ€ principle asserts that criminal behavior can be reliably predicted and that treatment should focus on the higher risk offenders; (2) the â€œneedâ€ principle underscores the importance of criminogenic needs in the design and delivery of treatment; and (3) the â€œresponsivityâ€ principle describes how the treatment should be provided (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). By contrast, the good lives model is based on the belief that everyone has certain primary needs including autonomy, happiness, health, relatedness and competence that they continually attempt to satisfy. From a good lives model perspective, criminal behaviors are effective but maladaptive strategies for satisfying these needs (Schaffer & Jeglic, 2010). Therefore, interventions should be designed to identify these unique needs and assist offenders learn honest and legitimate ways to satisfy them (Schaffer & Jeglic, 2010). Although of these models have their respective proponents and critics, there is a growing body of evidence that the risk/need/responsivity model represents a superior strategy. This paper creates a fictional but realistic scenario in which a hypothetical â€œoffenderâ€ is described, including the types of criminal activity and a â€œresponder role.â€ In addition, an offender rehabilitation response that includes the relevant factors from the risk/need/responsivity model perspective is followed by a summary of the research and important findings concerning identifying optimal offender rehabilitation strategies in the conclusion.
Review and Discussion
The hypothetical but all-too-common offender in this scenario is â€œJoseph,â€ a white, 20-year-old unemployed high school dropout from a broken home who is an impulsive as well as a drug and alcohol abuser. As a result, Joseph has become involved with the criminal justice system repeatedly over the years for crimes ranging from drug possession, petty theft, malicious mischief, criminal trespassing and most recently, charges for selling marijuana and having an illegal hand gun. In addition, Josephs proudly boasts of belonging to a local gang known as â€œThe Cutthroatsâ€ whose members are infamous in the community for their propensity for violence and he intimates that because he enjoys the â€œgangstaâ€ lifestyle, he will most likely remain a member during his incarceration and after his eventual release. In other words, Joseph has a clear disdain for the law and honest work.
Although Joseph was a poor performer in high school (he dropped out in his junior year), he reports being a member of the schoolâ€™s chess club and participating in several regional tournaments where he achieved a total of three wins and a draw. In addition, Joseph also reports enjoying playing basketball and pickup games of football when he was in middle school and high school. At present, Josephâ€™s primary leisure and recreational activities are limited to playing video games with fellow gang members and â€œjust hanging out and chillinâ€™ with his budsâ€ (e.g., his fellow gang members). In addition, Joseph reports having a number of girlfriends (usually gang â€œhangers-onâ€) over the years (none at present, however) and he has been sexually active since age 15 years. Following his arrest, it was determined that Joseph had just over three-quarters of a pound of marijuana in his possession which qualified him for an intent to distribute charge together with an illegal handgun for which he received 5 years in the state penitentiary.
Prior to his arrest, Joseph lived at home with his mother. Josephâ€™s parents were discovered 6 years ago and he has seen or heard from his father since except for once 2 years ago when he attended a funeral for a family member. During this encounter, Josephâ€™s father only exchanged curt greetings with him and nothing else. Likewise, Josephâ€™s relationship with his mother is highly strained, due in part to her alcoholism and longstanding refusal to secure meaningful employment, preferring to live off of welfare checks and food stamps, something that Joseph admits to resenting in the extreme. In essence, Joseph has been left to his own devices for the past 6 years by an absent father and disengaged mother and he has largely used this time to become increasingly dangerous to himself and his community through his criminal activities and gangster lifestyle.
Overview of the risk/need/responsivity model
The risk/need/responsivity (RNR) model was developed in the 1980s and formalized in 1990 (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). The RNR model is described by Bonta and Andrews as â€œPerhaps the most influential model for the assessment and treatment of offenders. The RNR model has been elaborated upon and contextualized within a general personality and cognitive social learning theory of criminal conductâ€ (2007, p. 1). As noted above, the RNR model is guided by three main principles (i.e., risk, need and responsivity) which are described further below.
The risk principle of the RNR model holds that recidivist behaviors by offender can be mitigated provided that the level of treatment services applied to offender rehabilitation is directly proportionate to their risk of reoffending (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). The risk principle is further divided into two components: (1) the level of treatment; and, (2) the offenderâ€™s risk of reoffending (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). According to Spencer (2013), â€œThe risk principle requires the use of a validated assessment process to effectively direct treatment resources to the highest-risk offendersâ€ (p. 9).
The RNR modelâ€™s need principle is focused on interventions that are designed to address criminogenic needs. According to Bonta and Andrews, â€œCriminogenic needs are dynamic risk factors that are directly linked to criminal behavior. Criminogenic needs can come and go unlike static risk factors that can only change in one direction (increase risk) and are immutable to treatment interventionâ€ (p. 5). Although offenders will likely have a number of unique needs that should be treated, not all such needs have linked with criminal behaviors (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). Offendersâ€™ criminogenic needs are classified under the major predictors for criminal behavior which are termed the â€œcentral eightâ€ risk/need factors (Bonta & Andrews, 2007, p. 5). All of the seven criminogenic needs (i.e.,  antisocial personality pattern;  procriminal attitudes;  social supports for crime;  substance abuse;  family/marital relationships;  school/work; and  prosocial recreational activities should be regarded as being important to assess and treat with the most efficacious interventions that are available (Bonta & Andrews, 2007).
Finally, the RNR modelâ€™s responsivity principle is based on the notion that the most effective strategies for teaching offenders new types of behavior to replace virtually any other type of behavior are cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)-based social learning interventions (Bonta & Andrews, 2007). In this regard, Ticknor (2017) advises that, â€œCBT uses strategies, such as positive and negative reinforcements and punishments, for behavior modification. Many have used CBT to treat a variety of problems, including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, personality disorders, eating disorders and substance abuseâ€ (p. 47).
The responsivity principle is also further divided into two more principles as follows: (1) the relationship principle (establishing a warm, respectful and collaborative working alliance with the client) and, (2) the structuring principle (influence the direction of change towards the prosocial through appropriate modeling, reinforcement, problem-solving, etc.) (Bonta & Andrews, 2007, p. 5). In addition, an especially noteworthy point made by Spencer (2013) concerning the responsivity principle is that it â€œ requires interventions to be responsive to temperament, learning styles, motivation, gender and culture when assigning offenders to programsâ€ (p. 9). Taken together, the RNR model provides a robust framework in which to assess offenders and to identify the most effective intervention for their unique needs (Spencer, 2013). In the capacity of a counselor tasked with fulfilling the responder role for Joseph, an application of the RNR model to his specific situation is provided below.
Application of the risk/need/responsivity model to Josephâ€™s rehabilitation
The RNR model is especially appropriate for application to Josephâ€™s situation and the formulation of rehabilitation intervention. In this regard, Nassen and Olucha (2017) report that, â€œThe RNR model, which has been researched extensively and found to be an effective model of treatment for sex offenders, domestic violence offenders, drug offenders and juvenile offendersâ€ (p. 21). In addition, a number of the RNR modelâ€™s major risk/need factors are highly applicable to Joseph. Table 1 below provides a description of the RNR modelâ€™s seven major risk/need factors (the eighth factor is criminal history but this is a static factor) together with recommendations for assessment and interventions goals.
The major risk/need factors applicable to Joseph along with some minor risk/need factors
Major need/risk factors
Relevance and Application to Joseph
Criminogenic needs, indicators and intervention goals
Antisocial personality pattern
Impulsive, adventurous pleasure seeking, restlessly aggressive and irritable.
Build self-management skills, teach anger management.
Joseph presents with all four of these indicators making the use of these interventions appropriate.
attitudes towards the
Counter rationalizations with
prosocial attitudes; build up a prosocial identity
Josephâ€™s membership in a gang will require an ongoing intervention that emphasizes its dead-end aspects (i.e., further institutionalization and/or death).
Social supports for crime
Criminal friends, isolation from prosocial others
Replace procriminal friends and associates with prosocial friends and associates
Given his sole reliance as a gang for his social support, it will be essential to provide Joseph with alternative prosocial supports networks.
Abuse of alcohol and/or drugs
Reduce substance abuse, enhance alternatives to substance use
Josephâ€™s accelerating abuse of alcohol and drugs will require specialized counseling as well as ongoing attendance at self-help substance abuse groups while he is imprisoned as well as following his release.
monitoring and disciplining, poor family relationships
Teaching parenting skills, enhance warmth and caring
Although Joseph clearly needs an intervention for this need/risk factor, this may be the most challenging factor to treat given his poor relationship with his estranged father and alcoholic mother.
Poor performance, low levels of satisfaction
Enhance work/study skills, nurture interpersonal relationships within the context of work and school
Besides the cognitive-based interventions used in the RNR model together with occupational rehabilitation and job training, Joseph needs to apply his apparent high intellect (based on his high school chess club performance) and secure his GED and higher educational opportunities.
Prosocial recreational activities
Lack of involvement in prosocial recreational/leisure
Encourage participation in prosocial recreational activities, teach prosocial hobbies and sports
Finally, interventions for this risk/need should focus on Josephâ€™s past interests in playing competitive chess and other sports.
Source: Adapted from Bonta & Andrews, 2007, p. 6
Formulating accurate assessment and developing appropriate evidence-based interventions for this exhaustive list of risk/needs, though, can be especially challenging for correctional institutions that lack the requisite resources (Ticknor, 2017). A recent pilot study was implemented at a juvenile corrections facility that incorporated virtual reality for RNR model-based interventions holds the promise of making these resources available to greater numbers of offenders. In this regard, Ticknor (2017) reports that, â€œThe virtual environment for the treatment of offenders, or VETO, combines virtual reality and cognitive behavior therapy for a group of residential juvenile offenders. The pilot program revealed several strengths and some additional considerations for those interested in this type of programâ€ (p. 47). While the VETO initiative is not a substitute for one-on-one and group therapy, it does offer the ability to extend treatment programming to a greater number of offenders as well as for different types of risk/needs (Ticknor, 2017).
One of the overarching strengths of the VETO strategy is the amenability of CBT programming for recreation in a virtual environment. For example, Ticknor points out that, â€œA typical CBT program in U.S. corrections incorporates modeling, role play, reinforcement and cognitive exercises to teach offenders how to replace maladaptive cognitions and how to deal with problematic events by using a variety of coping skillsâ€ (p. 47). The VETO initiative depends on achieving full immersion by offenders into virtual world where these CBT-based exercises can be completed in a highly cost-effective fashion using the headset depicted in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1. Oculus virtual reality headset used in the VETO pilot program
Because many younger offenders in particular such as Joseph are not only computer literate but also skilled in video gaming, the VETO strategy has received strong support from both corrections officials and offenders. As Benbouriche (2014) emphasizes, â€œItâ€™s a natural progression to use technology in the criminal justice system to help assess offenders and improve the treatments available. It offers greater potential to customize treatments to each individual, uses the known beneficial effects of virtual reality-based cognitive behavioral therapy to boost offender rehabilitation, and can be used to gauge how effective a treatment has beenâ€ (para. 5). Nevertheless, not all offenders â€“ young or otherwise â€“ will benefit equally from these exercises. As Bonta and Alexander (2007) point out, â€œOffender treatment programs involve teaching offenders new behaviors and cognitions and to maximize this learning experience requires attention not only to whether the offender is a visual learner or an auditory learner but a whole range of personal-cognitive-social factorsâ€ (p. 7). Notwithstanding this consideration, though, the VETO initiative represents a valuable addition to the RNR model resources that are available to corrections officials today.
The research showed that as the name suggests, the risk/need/responsivity model consists of three main principles (the â€œriskâ€ principle, the â€œneedâ€ principle and the â€œresponsivityâ€ principle). In addition, seven of the so-called â€œcentral eightâ€ risk/need factors (antisocial personality pattern; procriminal attitudes; social supports for crime; substance abuse; family/marital relationships; school/work; and prosocial recreational activities) are criminogenic factors that are appropriate for assessment and RNR model-based treatments that draw on cognitive-behavioral therapeutic interventions. The research also showed that the RNR model is especially useful for treating offenders with a multifaceted range of risk-need factors because it prioritizes offendersâ€™ needs and focuses on treating those who are most at risk of reoffending. Finally, the virtual environment for the treatment of offenders will help corrections officials provide these types of interventions for a wide range of offenses and greater numbers of offenders.
Benbouriche, M. (2014, November 10). How virtual reality can help treat sex offenders. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/how-virtual-reality-can-help-treat-sex-offenders-33955.
Bonta, J. & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Ottawa: Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.
Nassen, N. & Olucha, G. (2017, July-August). How do we change course? Navigating obstacles to develop and implement a risk-need-responsivity model in a correctional setting. Corrections Today, 79(4), 20-24.
Spencer, L. S. (2013, September-October). Evidence-based practices work. Corrections Today, 74(4), 8-11.
Ticknor, B. (2017, May-June). Pilot 1.0: Creating a virtual environment for the treatment of offenders. Corrections Today, 79(3), 46-50.
We provide professional writing services to help you score straight A’s by submitting custom written assignments that mirror your guidelines.
Get result-oriented writing and never worry about grades anymore. We follow the highest quality standards to make sure that you get perfect assignments.
Our writers have experience in dealing with papers of every educational level. You can surely rely on the expertise of our qualified professionals.
Your deadline is our threshold for success and we take it very seriously. We make sure you receive your papers before your predefined time.
Someone from our customer support team is always here to respond to your questions. So, hit us up if you have got any ambiguity or concern.
Sit back and relax while we help you out with writing your papers. We have an ultimate policy for keeping your personal and order-related details a secret.
We assure you that your document will be thoroughly checked for plagiarism and grammatical errors as we use highly authentic and licit sources.
Still reluctant about placing an order? Our 100% Moneyback Guarantee backs you up on rare occasions where you aren’t satisfied with the writing.
You don’t have to wait for an update for hours; you can track the progress of your order any time you want. We share the status after each step.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
Although you can leverage our expertise for any writing task, we have a knack for creating flawless papers for the following document types.
From brainstorming your paper's outline to perfecting its grammar, we perform every step carefully to make your paper worthy of A grade.
Hire your preferred writer anytime. Simply specify if you want your preferred expert to write your paper and we’ll make that happen.
Get an elaborate and authentic grammar check report with your work to have the grammar goodness sealed in your document.
You can purchase this feature if you want our writers to sum up your paper in the form of a concise and well-articulated summary.
You don’t have to worry about plagiarism anymore. Get a plagiarism report to certify the uniqueness of your work.
Join us for the best experience while seeking writing assistance in your college life. A good grade is all you need to boost up your academic excellence and we are all about it.
We create perfect papers according to the guidelines.
We seamlessly edit out errors from your papers.
We thoroughly read your final draft to identify errors.
Work with ultimate peace of mind because we ensure that your academic work is our responsibility and your grades are a top concern for us!
Dedication. Quality. Commitment. Punctuality
Here is what we have achieved so far. These numbers are evidence that we go the extra mile to make your college journey successful.
We have the most intuitive and minimalistic process so that you can easily place an order. Just follow a few steps to unlock success.
We understand your guidelines first before delivering any writing service. You can discuss your writing needs and we will have them evaluated by our dedicated team.
We write your papers in a standardized way. We complete your work in such a way that it turns out to be a perfect description of your guidelines.
We promise you excellent grades and academic excellence that you always longed for. Our writers stay in touch with you via email.